With music, most things are relative. There has been a lot of music written throughout history, but much of it is not listened to very often, not because it isn't very good music, but because people prefer to listen to music that stirs certain emotions within them. These emotions give them gratification, inspiration, peace, hope, a spiritual connection, or all of the above. Unfortunately there seem to be a lot of composers that are so focused on making there music "technically" interesting that they sometimes miss the whole point of connecting with they're listeners on an emotional level. But this is more complicated than it appears; how are you supposed to know what people "want" to hear? Is there any kind of music that is the "right" kind of music, or that could be considered "better" than another kind of music?
I get so confused when I look at twentieth century, abstract, paintings. Granted, I don't consider myself an expert in being able to translate the meaning of these messy canvas's, but does that mean that in order to partake in the benefit of even enjoying or being touched by this art I have to have a certain number of years of schooling? Now, don't get me wrong, I believe there is a place for acquiring and developing a taste for something, it just seems to me that in order to have the biggest impact with your art, you must be able to speak clearly to your audience without ANY prerequisites on there part. If you listen to Beethoven's famous Choral Symphony number 9, or the Hallelujah chorus in Handel's Messiah, it doesn't matter how much you know about classical music, it has a powerful impact on you regardless of your pedigree. This music is timeless because it has the ability to speak to anyone. This is how I define "good" music.




